Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Hans Rehberg vs Maxime Cressy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rehberg vs Cressy analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Hans Rehberg vs Maxime Cressy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rehberg 1 - 0 Cressy
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rehberg has won 52% of points on their second serve, while Cressy has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rehberg, in recent form, has won 50.52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cressy has won 45.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.61% and 30.82% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rehberg has saved 59.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cressy has saved 62.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rehberg has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Cressy winning 48.39% (W/L 30/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rehberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Cressy has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 78/ 44), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 37% (W/L 18/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Rehberg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 12/ 13), where as Cressy has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.33% of matches (W/L 19/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rehberg winning 1 times and Cressy being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rehberg winning 2 and Cressy winning 1. The last match between Rehberg and Cressy was at the Ismaning Challenger, 31-10-2023, First, Carpet with Max Hans Rehberg getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:33:5.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rehberg and Cressy have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rehberg winning 1 times and Cressy 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Rehberg winning 1, and Cressy 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rehberg has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.15 while Cressy has played against players with an average rank of 264.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rehberg has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cressy has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rehberg has converted 40.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cressy has converted 36.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
455
Rank
382
High
20
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
184
Rank
31
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
52% (75-69)
Career Total W/L
57% (233-175)
61% (19-12)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$1,658,705
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Max Hans Rehberg | Maxime Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 19 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 22 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:33:5 | 2:33:5 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (73/116) | 63% (66/104) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (55/73) | 77% (51/66) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 58% (25/43) | 58% (22/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 10% (1/10) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (31/104) | 31% (36/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) |
Stats 
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Maxime Cressy
63%
(
73 of
116)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
5
Aces
22
9
Double Faults
9
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
51 of
66)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
31%
(
36 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
31 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Hans Rehberg | Maxime Cressy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (19/12) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (41/30) | 57% (43/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (375/345) | 53% (404/363) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 70% (14/6) | 67% (6/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.32 | 1.09 |
| Aces Total | 114 | 408 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.74 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 278 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:48:32 | 1:53:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151 | 287.34 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1483/2233) | 58% (1379/2358) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (1043/1483) | 79% (1090/1379) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (390/750) | 51% (500/979) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (85/209) | 37% (75/205) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (863/2305) | 36% (871/2422) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 67% (10/5) |
| Futures W/L | 72% (13/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (19/31) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 53% (10/19) | 38% (6/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (6/9) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (14/14) | 80% (20/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (14/0) | 20% (20/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (17/5) | 17% (12/2) |
Max Hans Rehberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
6
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
86%
(
38 of
44)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
37 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
17 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Sorger
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Julius Seifert
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Cressy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Maxime Cressy
76%
(
81 of
107)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
10
Aces
19
2
Double Faults
8
79%
(
64 of
81)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
53 of
61)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
29 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
22 of
98)
100
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Liam Gavrielides
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
40%
(
23 of
58)
11
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Beibit Zhukayev
Player
Maxime Cressy
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
10
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Maxime Cressy
81%
(
100 of
123)
1st Serve %
60%
(
67 of
112)
5
Aces
25
2
Double Faults
12
70%
(
70 of
100)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
56 of
67)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
37 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
33 of
112)
119
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(11) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Maxime Cressy
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
1
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
8
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Maxime Cressy
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
8
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Yuta Shimizu
50%
(
61 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
123)
19
Aces
3
17
Double Faults
4
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
52 of
76)
47%
(
28 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
43 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
123)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Mark Lajal
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
9
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
8
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
29 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Hiroki Moriya
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
10
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
view more
Rehberg Vs Cressy Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rehberg are available here and Cressy photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
